PROPOSED
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B. 2261
(Reference to printed bill)
Page 1, between lines 1 and 2, insert:
"Section 1. Section 28-3393, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
28-3393. Defensive driving school attendance; discrimination prohibited; notice requirements
A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, an eligible individual who elects to attend a defensive driving school shall attend one of the following within the time allowed by the court:
1. A defensive driving school that is certified by the supreme court and complies with the court automation and reporting requirements pursuant to subsections B and C of this section.
2. On application to the court and on the showing of reasonable justification by the individual, another supreme court certified defensive driving school. Reasonable justification includes the fact that the individual resides in another area and that attendance at any of the defensive driving schools that comply with the court automation and reporting requirements creates a hardship on the individual.
B. On the expiration of all contracts that are in existence on July 1, 2007 between the court and a defensive driving school provider, an eligible individual who elects to attend a defensive driving school may attend any supreme court certified defensive driving school that complies with the court automation and reporting requirements. For the purposes of this subsection, the renewal of any contract between a court and a defensive driving school after July 1, 2007, shall be considered a new contract.
C. A court may adopt requirements for a school to electronically report school completions and to transfer funds, subject to the approval of the defensive driving board.
D. A law enforcement officer or a jurisdiction issuing a civil traffic citation to an individual shall provide notice to the individual that if eligible, the individual may attend any supreme court certified defensive driving school subject to subsection B of this section.
E. A court shall not promote or favor any supreme court certified defensive driving school over another, except that The notice provided pursuant to subsection D of this section:
1. May exclude a school that does not comply with the court's automation and reporting requirements pursuant to subsections B and C of this section.
2. Shall exclude a school if the court finds that there is common ownership of at least five percent between the school and another school included on the notice unless the common ownership is disclosed."
Renumber to conform
Page 1, line 5, strike "prohibited" insert "; requirements"
Line 29, strike "not"
Line 30, after the period insert "For each school on the list, the supreme court shall include the copyright number for the school's educational materials, physical address of the owner and employer identification number. The list may not include a school if the court finds that there is common ownership of at least five percent between the school and another school included on the notice unless the common ownership is disclosed."
Amend title to conform