HB2585 - 532R

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 8-533, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE8-533. Petition; who may file; grounds

A. Any person or agency that has a legitimate interest in the welfare of a child, including, but not limited to, a relative, a foster parent, a physician, the department or a private licensed child welfare agency, may file a petition for the termination of the parent‑child relationship alleging grounds contained in subsection B of this section.

B. Evidence sufficient to justify the termination of the parent‑child relationship shall include any one of the following, and in considering any of the following grounds, the court shall also consider the best interests of the child:

1. That the parent has abandoned the child.

2. That the parent has neglected or wilfully abused a child. This abuse includes serious physical or emotional injury or situations in which the parent knew or reasonably should have known that a person was abusing or neglecting a child.

3. That the parent is unable to discharge parental responsibilities because of mental illness, mental deficiency or a history of chronic abuse of dangerous drugs, controlled substances or alcohol and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the condition will continue for a prolonged indeterminate period.

4. That the parent is deprived of civil liberties due to the conviction of a felony if the felony of which that parent was convicted is of such nature as to prove the unfitness of that parent to have future custody and control of the child, including murder of another child of the parent, manslaughter of another child of the parent or aiding or abetting or attempting, conspiring or soliciting to commit murder or manslaughter of another child of the parent, or if the sentence of that parent is of such length that the child will be deprived of a normal home for a period of years.

5. That the potential father failed to file a paternity action within thirty days of completion of service of notice as prescribed in section 8‑106, subsection G.

6. That the putative father failed to file a notice of claim of paternity as prescribed in section 8‑106.01.

7. That the parents have relinquished their rights to a child to an agency or have consented to the adoption.

8. That the child is being cared for in an out‑of‑home placement under the supervision of the juvenile court, the division or a licensed child welfare agency, that the agency responsible for the care of the child has made a diligent effort to provide appropriate reunification services and that one of the following circumstances exists:

(a) The child has been in an out‑of‑home placement for a cumulative total period of nine months or longer pursuant to court order or voluntary placement pursuant to section 8‑806 and the parent has substantially neglected or wilfully refused to remedy the circumstances that cause the child to be in an out‑of‑home placement.

(b) The child who is under three years of age has been in an out‑of‑home placement for a cumulative total period of six months or longer pursuant to court order and the parent has substantially neglected or wilfully refused to remedy the circumstances that cause the child to be in an out-of-home placement, including refusal to participate in reunification services offered by the department.

(c) The child has been in an out‑of‑home placement for a cumulative total period of fifteen months or longer pursuant to court order or voluntary placement pursuant to section 8‑806, the parent has been unable to remedy the circumstances that cause the child to be in an out‑of‑home placement and there is a substantial likelihood that the parent will not be capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control in the near future.

9. That the identity of the parent is unknown and continues to be unknown following three months of diligent efforts to identify and locate the parent.

10. That the parent has had parental rights to another child terminated within the preceding two years for the same cause and is currently unable to discharge parental responsibilities due to the same cause.

11. That all of the following are true:

(a) The child was cared for in an out‑of‑home placement pursuant to court order.

(b) The agency responsible for the care of the child made diligent efforts to provide appropriate reunification services.

(c) The child, pursuant to court order, was returned to the legal custody of the parent from whom the child had been removed.

(d) Within eighteen months after the child was returned, pursuant to court order, the child was removed from that parent's legal custody, the child is being cared for in an out‑of‑home placement under the supervision of the juvenile court, the division or a licensed child welfare agency and the parent is currently unable to discharge parental responsibilities.

12. That the first parent of a child knowingly or intentionally engaged in sexual intercourse with the other parent and this action resulted in the conception of the child, if one of the following is true:

(a) The conduct occurred without the consent of the other parent.

(b) The conduct occurred when the other parent was under fifteen years of age.

(c) The conduct occurred when the other parent was fifteen, sixteen or seventeen years of age and the first parent was in a position of TRUST TO the other parent.

C. Evidence considered by the court pursuant to subsection B of this section shall include any substantiated allegations of abuse or neglect committed in another jurisdiction.

D. In considering the grounds for termination prescribed in subsection B, paragraph 8 or 11 of this section, the court shall consider the availability of reunification services to the parent and the participation of the parent in these services.

E. In considering the grounds for termination prescribed in subsection B, paragraph 8 of this section, the court shall not consider the first sixty days of the initial out‑of‑home placement pursuant to section 8‑806 in the cumulative total period.

F. The failure of an alleged parent who is not the child's legal parent to take a test requested by the department or ordered by the court to determine if the person is the child's natural parent is prima facie evidence of abandonment unless good cause is shown by the alleged parent for that failure.

G. If termination of the parent‑child relationship is sought pursuant to the grounds prescribed in subsection B, paragraph 12 of this section:

1. The court shall consider the wishes of the victim of the conduct.

2. A rebuttable presumption exists that termination of the parent‑child relationship is in the best interests of the child if the first parent was convicted of a criminal offense for the conduct.

3. There is no presumption that having only one legal parent is contrary to the best interests of the child.

4. Termination of the parent‑child relationship does not terminate the legal obligation of the parent whose rights have been terminated to pay child support or birth‑related expenses, unless the other parent declines the payment of the child support or birth‑related expenses. END_STATUTE