Senate Engrossed |
State of Arizona Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session 2018
|
SENATE BILL 1113 |
|
|
AN ACT
amending section 11-815, Arizona Revised Statutes; relating to county zoning.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 11-815, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
11-815. Enforcement; county zoning inspector; deputies; building permits; violations; classification; civil penalties; hearing officers and procedures
A. The county zoning ordinance shall provide for its enforcement within a zoned territory by means of withholding building permits, and for such those purposes may establish the position of county zoning inspector, and such deputy inspectors as may be required, who shall be appointed by the board.
B. After the establishment and filling of the position, it is unlawful to erect, construct, reconstruct, alter or use any building or other structure within a zoning district covered by the ordinance without first obtaining a building permit from the inspector and for that purpose the applicant shall provide the zoning inspector with a sketch of the proposed construction containing sufficient information for the enforcement of the zoning ordinance. A permit is not required for repairs or improvements of a value not exceeding five hundred dollars. Reasonable fees may be charged for the issuance of a permit. The inspector shall recognize the limitations placed on the inspector's authority by sections 11-804 and 11‑811, and shall issue the permit when it appears that the proposed erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration or use fully conforms to the zoning ordinance. In any other case the inspector shall withhold the permit.
C. It is unlawful to erect, construct, reconstruct, maintain or use any land in any zoning district in violation of any regulation or any provision of any ordinance pertaining to the land and any violation constitutes a public nuisance. Any person, firm or corporation violating an ordinance, or any part of an ordinance, is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor. Each day during which the illegal erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, maintenance or use continues is a separate offense.
D. A county may establish civil penalties for a violation of any zoning regulation or ordinance. Civil penalties shall not exceed the amount of the maximum fine for a class 2 misdemeanor. Each day of continuance of the violation constitutes a separate violation. If an alleged violator is served with a notice of violation pursuant to subsection E of this section, the alleged violator is not subject to a criminal charge arising out of the same facts.
E. A county that establishes a civil penalty for a violation of a zoning regulation or ordinance may appoint hearing officers to hear and determine zoning violations. If the zoning inspector reports a zoning violation to the hearing officer, the hearing officer shall hold a hearing after serving notice of the hearing has been served on the alleged violator. The zoning inspector shall cause the notice shall to be personally served on the alleged violator by the zoning inspector at least five days before the hearing. Personal service may be made by a zoning inspector or by any person authorized to perform personal service by the Arizona rules of civil procedure. If it is impracticable for the zoning inspector is unable to cause the notice to be personally serve the notice served, the notice may be served in the same manner prescribed for alternative methods of service by the Arizona rules of civil procedure. A notice served on the alleged violator other than by personal service shall be served at least thirty days before the hearing. For the purposes of this subsection, "impracticable" includes service of the notice outside the boundaries of the county or in situations in which the hearing officer reasonably determines that personal service on the alleged violator would jeopardize the safety of the zoning inspector or other persons authorized to perform personal service by the Arizona rules of civil procedure.
F. At the hearing, the zoning inspector shall present evidence showing the existence of a zoning violation and the alleged violator or the alleged violator's attorney or other designated representative shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present evidence. The county attorney may present evidence on behalf of the zoning inspector. At the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer shall determine whether a zoning violation exists and, if a violation is found to exist, may impose civil penalties pursuant to subsection D of this section.
G. A hearing officer may be an employee of the county and shall be appointed by the board of supervisors. A review of decisions of the hearing officer by the board of supervisors shall be available to any party to the hearing. The board of supervisors may delegate this review to a county board of adjustment. If the board of supervisors elects to delegate this review, the board of supervisors shall delegate all requested reviews to the board of adjustment. The board of supervisors shall adopt written rules of procedure for the hearing and review of hearings, which shall be adopted in the same manner as zoning ordinances. Judicial review of the final decisions of the board of supervisors or a board of adjustment shall be pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6. A county that establishes civil penalties for a violation of a zoning regulation or ordinance is not precluded from pursuing the remedies as provided for in subsection H of this section.
H. If any building or structure is or is proposed to be erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, maintained or used or any land is or is proposed to be used in violation of this chapter or any ordinance, regulation or provision enacted or adopted by the board under the authority granted by this chapter, the board, the county attorney, the inspector or any adjacent or neighboring property owner who is specially damaged by the violation, in addition to the other remedies provided by law, may institute injunction, mandamus, abatement or any other appropriate action or proceedings to prevent, or abate or remove the unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, maintenance or use.