ARIZONA STATE SENATE
RESEARCH STAFF
JEFFREY ONG |
LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH ANALYST EDUCATION COMMITTEE Telephone: (602) 926-3171 |
TO: MEMBERS OF THE SENATE
EDUCATION COMMITTEE
DATE: March 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Strike everything amendment to H.B. 2123, relating to pupil suspensions and expulsions; schools
Purpose
Restricts school districts and charter schools from suspending or expelling pupils younger than seven years old. Limits pupil suspensions and expulsions to outlined conditions including aggravating circumstances.
Background
Statute requires pupils to comply with rules, pursue a required course of study and submit to the authority of teachers, administrators and the school district governing board (governing board). A pupil can be removed from the classroom if: 1) the teacher documents that a pupil repeatedly interferes with the teacher’s ability to communicate effectively in the classroom or other pupils’ ability to learn; or 2) the teacher determines the pupil’s behavior is so unruly, disruptive or abusive that it interferes with the teacher’s ability to communicate effectively in the classroom or other pupils’ ability to learn (A.R.S. § 15-841).
Currently, a pupil can be expelled for continued open defiance of authority, disruptive or disorderly behavior, violent behavior including the use or display of a dangerous instrument, deadly weapon or a gun, or excessive absenteeism. As an alternative to suspension or expulsion, a pupil can be reassigned to an alternative education program if the pupil does not qualify for participation in the alternative to suspension program and if good cause exists for expulsion or for long-term suspension (A.R.S. § 15-841).
A school district governing board, in consultation with teachers and parents, prescribes rules for the discipline, suspension and expulsion of pupils which requires a notice and hearing procedure for cases involving a pupil who is suspended for more than 10 days. Additionally, district rules outline procedures and conditions for readmitting a pupil and provide appeal procedures if the suspension decision was not made by the governing board (A.R.S. § 15-843).
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this legislation.
Provisions
1. Allows a school district or charter school to suspend or expel a pupil enrolled in kindergarten or grades one through four, only under the following conditions:
a) the pupil is at least seven years old;
b) the pupil engaged in conduct on school grounds that:
i. involves the unauthorized possession of a dangerous weapon;
ii. involves the possession, use or sale of a dangerous drug, narcotic drug or a violation of a drug free school zone;
iii. endangers the health or safety of others; or
iv. qualifies as outlined aggravating circumstances as determined by the governing board or charter school governing body;
c) failing to remove a pupil from the school building creates a safety threat that cannot be reasonably addressed or qualifies as outlined aggravating circumstances;
d) the school district or charter school, before suspending or expelling a pupil, considers and employs alternative behavioral and disciplinary interventions that are appropriate to the circumstances considering health and safety, and in consultation with the pupil’s parent or guardian if possible; and
e) the school district or charter school provides for readmission procedures for pupils:
i. who have served at least 5 school days of a suspension exceeding 10 school days, on appeal of a pupil’s parent or guardian; and
ii. who are expelled or subject to alternative reassignment at the school, on appeal of a pupil’s parent or guardian, at least 20 days after the effective date of the expulsion or alternative reassignment.
2. Specifies aggravating circumstances are all of the following:
a) the pupil is engaged in persistent behavior documented by the school that prevents other students from learning or the teacher from maintaining control of the classroom environment;
b) the pupil’s ongoing behavior is unresponsive to targeted interventions as documented by an established intervention process including consultation with a school counselor, mental health professional or social worker, if available;
c) the pupil’s parent or guardian was notified and consulted about the ongoing behavior; and
d) the school provides a disability screening for the pupil, before a long-term suspension or expulsion, that determines the pupil’s behavioral issues were not the result of a disability.
3. Directs a school district or charter school to document the alternative behavioral and disciplinary intervention it considers and employs.
4. Defines aggravating circumstances as persistent behavior by a pupil that:
a) has been documented by the school;
b) prevents other students from learning or the teacher from maintaining control of the classroom environment; and
c) is unresponsive to targeted interventions as documented through an established intervention process.
5. Makes technical and conforming changes.
6. Becomes effective on the general effective date.