Assigned to JUD                                                                                                                     FOR COMMITTEE

 


 

 

 


ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Fifth Legislature, Second Regular Session

 

FACT SHEET FOR h.b. 2695

 

forfeiture; substitute assets; postdeprivation hearing

Purpose

Allows the court to order the forfeiture of substitute assets when appropriate.

Background

After a person is convicted for an offense to which forfeiture applies, a court may order the person to forfeit: 1) property the person acquired through the commission of the offense;
2) property directly traceable to property acquired through the commission of the offense; and
3) any property or instrumentality the person used in the commission of the offense or to facilitate the offense. A person may file a claim of interest in seized property by filing a motion with the superior court requesting the release of claimed property and stating the facts to support the person's alleged interest in the property (A.R.S. §§ 13-4304 and 13-4309).

            A court must determine probable cause before property may be seized for forfeiture as a substitute asset. The forfeiture of substitute assets may be ordered if the property: 1) cannot be located; 2) has been transferred, conveyed or sold to a third party; 3) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; 4) has been substantially diminished in value by any act or omission of the defendant; 5) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; or 6) is subject to any interest that is exempt from forfeiture (A.R.S. §§ 13-4305 and
13-4313). Substitute assets means any other property that has up to the same value as property or interest acquired through a criminal enterprise and proceeds traceable to racketeering offenses (A.R.S. § 13-2314).

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this legislation.

Provisions

1.   Allows the court, after a person is convicted for an offense to which forfeiture applies, to order the person to forfeit any substitute assets as outlined and in accordance with requirements relating to seizure of property.

2.   Specifies that statute governing the return of claimed property in postdeprivation hearings does not prevent:

a)   the state from returning any property to the owner of the property; or

b)   the filing of a racketeering lien or a restitution lien.

3.   Makes technical changes.

4.   Becomes effective on the general effective date.

House Action

JUD                 2/16/22      DP     9-0-0-1

3rd Read          2/23/22                 59-0-1

Prepared by Senate Research

March 8, 2022

ZD/sr