The Arizona Revised Statutes have been updated to include the revised sections from the 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session. Please note that the next update of this compilation will not take place until after the conclusion of the 56th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session, which convenes in January 2024.
DISCLAIMER
This online version of the Arizona Revised Statutes is primarily maintained for legislative drafting purposes and reflects the version of law that is effective on January 1st of the year following the most recent legislative session. The official version of the Arizona Revised Statutes is published by Thomson Reuters.
47-9604 - Procedure if security agreement covers real property or fixtures
47-9604. Procedure if security agreement covers real property or fixtures
A. If a security agreement covers both personal and real property, a secured party may proceed:
1. Under this article as to the personal property without prejudicing any rights with respect to the real property; or
2. As to both the personal property and the real property in accordance with the rights with respect to the real property, in which case the other provisions of this article do not apply.
B. Subject to subsection C, if a security agreement covers goods that are or become fixtures, a secured party may proceed:
1. Under this article; or
2. In accordance with the rights with respect to real property, in which case the other provisions of this article do not apply.
C. Subject to the other provisions of this article, if a secured party holding a security interest in fixtures has priority over all owners and encumbrancers of the real property, the secured party, after default, may remove the collateral from the real property.
D. A secured party that removes collateral shall promptly reimburse any encumbrancer or owner of the real property, other than the debtor, for the cost of repair of any physical injury caused by the removal. The secured party need not reimburse the encumbrancer or owner for any diminution in value of the real property caused by the absence of the goods removed or by any necessity of replacing them. A person entitled to reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the secured party gives adequate assurance for the performance of the obligation to reimburse.