The Arizona Revised Statutes have been updated to include the revised sections from the 56th Legislature, 1st Regular Session. Please note that the next update of this compilation will not take place until after the conclusion of the 56th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session, which convenes in January 2024.
DISCLAIMER
This online version of the Arizona Revised Statutes is primarily maintained for legislative drafting purposes and reflects the version of law that is effective on January 1st of the year following the most recent legislative session. The official version of the Arizona Revised Statutes is published by Thomson Reuters.
A. If the deputy director determines from the available facts that the conduct of the respondent is likely to cause the financial institution or enterprise to suffer substantial financial loss before an order can be issued under section 6-161, the deputy director may issue a temporary order prohibiting the respondent from further participation in any manner in the conduct of the affairs of the financial institution or enterprise. The order shall contain a statement of the alleged facts which form the basis of the order and becomes effective on service on the respondent. A copy of the order shall also be served on the financial institution or enterprise. The order expires by its terms within such time after entry, not to exceed twenty days, as the deputy director fixes, unless the respondent consents to a longer period or within the time fixed in the order it is extended by supplemental order issued by the deputy director and served on the respondent and the financial institution or enterprise. On two days' notice to the financial institution or enterprise the respondent may move that the deputy director stay, dissolve or modify the order, and the deputy director shall proceed to hear and determine such motion as expeditiously as justice requires.
B. The respondent served with a temporary order may apply to the superior court for a stay of the order pending the completion of the administrative proceedings under section 6-161, and the court has jurisdiction to stay the order if the deputy director has refused to stay the order or to promptly consider the respondent's request for a stay.